Self-doped polymers from polyaniline with bronsted acid groups

ABSTRACT

A self-doped conducting polymer having along its backbone a π-electron conjugated system which comprises a plurality of monomer units, between about 0.01 and 100 mole % of the units having covalently linked thereto at least one Bronsted acid group. The conductive zwitterionic polymer is also provided, as are monomers useful in the preparation of the polymer and electrodes comprising the polymer.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/243,530, filed 12 Sep. 1988, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/156,928, filed 14 Dec. 1987, also abandoned.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to the field of conducting polymers. More particularly the invention relates to self-doped conjugated polymers in which Bronsted acid groups are covalently bound to the backbone of the polymer.

BACKGROUND

The requirements for conductive polymers used in the electronic and other industries are becoming more and more stringent. There is also an increasing need for materials which permit reduction in the size and weight of electronic parts and which themselves exhibit long-term stability and superior performance.

In order to satisfy these demands, active efforts have been made in recent years to develop new conductive macromolecular or polymeric materials. A number of proposals have also been made regarding the potential uses of such new compounds. For example, P. J. Nigrey et al. in Chem. Comm. pp. 591 et seq. (1979) have disclosed the use of polyacetylenes as secondary battery electrodes. Similarly, in the J. Electro Chem. Soc., p. 1651 et seq. (1651) and in Japanese Patent Application Nos. 136469/1981, 121168/1981, 3870/1984, 3872/1984, 3873/1984, 196566/1984, 196573/1984, 203368/1984, and 203369/1984, have also disclosed the use of polyacetylenes, Schiff base-containing quinazone polymers, polyarylene quinones, poly-p-phenylenes, poly-2,5-thienylenes and other polymeric materials as electrode materials for secondary batteries.

The use of polymeric materials in electrochromic applications has also been suggested, in, e.g., A. F. Diaz et al., J. Electroanal. Chem. 111: 111 et seq. (1980), Yoneyama et al., J. Electroanal. Chem. 161, p. 419 (1984) (polyaniline), A. F. Diaz et al., J. Electroanal. Chem. 149:101 (1983) (polypyrrole), M. A. Druy et al., Journal de Physique 44: C3-595 (June 1983), and Kaneto et al., Japan Journal of Applied Physics 22(7): L412 (1983) (polythiophene).

These highly conductive polymers known in the art are typically rendered conductive through the process of doping with acceptors or donors. In acceptor doping, the backbone of the acceptor-doped polymer is oxidized, thereby introducing positive charges into the polymer chain. Similarly, in donor doping, the polymer is reduced, so that negative charges are introduced into the polymer chain. It is these mobile positive or negative charges which are externally introduced into the polymer chains that are responsible for the electrical conductivity of the doped polymers. In addition, such "p-type" (oxidation) or "n-type" (reduction) doping is responsible for substantially all the changes in electronic structure which occur after doping, including, for example, changes in the optical and infrared absorption spectra.

Thus, in all previous methods of doping the counterions are derived from an external acceptor or donor functionality. During electrochemical cycling between neutral and ionic states, then, the counterions must migrate in and out of the bulk of the polymer. This solid state diffusion of externally introduced counterions is often the rate-limiting step in the cycling process. It is thus desirable to overcome this limitation and thereby increase the response time in electrochemical or electrchromic doping and undoping operations. It has been found that the response time can be shortened if the period required for migration of counterions can be curtailed. The present invention is predicated upon this discovery.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides conducting polymers that can be rapidly doped and undoped, and which are capable of maintaining a stable, doped state for long periods of time relative to conducting polymers of the prior art. The superior properties of the polymers of the present invention result from the discovery that conducting polymers can be made in a "self-doped" form; i.e., the counterion that provides conductivity can be covalently linked to the polymer itself. In contrast to the polymers of the prior art, therefore, the need for externally introduced couterions is obviated, and the rate-limiting diffusion step alluded to above is eliminated as well.

The polymers of the invention can display conductivities of on the order of at least about 1 S/cm. The self-doped polymers may be used as electrodes in electrochemical cells, as conductive layers in electrochromic displays, field effective transistors, Schottky diodes and the like, or in any number of applications where a highly conductive polymer which exhibits rapid doping kinetics is desirable.

In its broadest aspect, the present invention is directed to a conducting self-doped polymer having along its backbone a p-electron conjugated system which comprises a plurality of monomer units, between about 0.01 and 100 mole % of said units having covalently linked thereto at least one Bronsted acid group. The present invention also encompasses the zwitterionic form of such polymers. Polymers which may form the backbone of the compounds of the present invention include, for example, polypyrroles, polythiophenes, polyisothianaphthenes, polyanilines, poly-p-phenylenes and copolymers thereof.

In a preferred embodiment, self-doped polymers described above have a recurring structure selected from the following structures (I), (II) or (III): ##STR1## wherein, in Formula I: Ht is a heterogroup; Y₁ is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and -R-X-M; M is an atom or group which when oxidized yields a positive monovalent counterion; X is a Bronsted acid anion; and R is a linear or branched alkyl, ether, ester or amide moiety having between 1 and about 10 carbon atoms. In Formulae II and III, Y₂, Y₃ and Y₄ are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and -R-X-M, and R, X and M are as given for Formula I.

A preferred subset of the poly(p-phenylenevinylenes) given by Formula III may be represented by structure III-1, as follows: ##STR2## In Formula III-1, M is as defined earlier, n is an integer in the range of 1 to 10 inclusive, and R' is --(CH₂)_(n) SO₃ ⁻ M⁺, alkyl (1-10C), or aryl. In the latter case, R' is typically monocyclic, and may or may not be substituted with one or more alkyl (1-10C) groups.

In yet another preferred embodiment of the invention, a conductive polymer is provided containing a recurring zwitterionic structure according to (Ia), (IIa) or (IIIa): ##STR3## wherein Ht, R and X are as defined above.

The invention is also directed to monomers useful in making the above self-doped polymers, methods of synthesizing the polymers, and devices employing the polymers.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is an infrared spectrum of poly(thiophene-3-acetic acid);

FIG. 2 is an infrared spectrum of poly(thiophene-3-acetic acid sodium salt);

FIG. 3 is an infrared spectrum of poly(methyl thiophene-3-(2-ethanesulfonate));

FIG. 4 is an infrared spectrum of poly(thiophene-3-(2-ethanesulfonic acid sodium salt));

FIG. 5 depicts a series of vis-near ir spectra of poly(thiophene-3-(2-ethanesulfonic acid) sodium salt);

FIG. 6 depicts a series ov vis-near ir spectra of poly(thiophene-3-(4-butanesulfonic acid) sodium salt);

FIG. 7 depicts a series ov vis-near ir spectra of poly(thiophene-3-(4-butanesulfonic acid) sodium salt);

FIG. 8 illustrates the results of cyclic voltammetry carried out on films of poly(thiophene-3-sulfonic acid); and

FIG. 9 depicts a series of vis-near ir spectra of poly(thiophene-3-sulfonic acid).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The terms "conducting" or "conductive" indicate the ability to transmit electric charge by the passage of ionized atoms or electrons. "Conducting" or "conductive" compounds include compounds which embody or incorporate mobile ions or electrons as well as compounds which may be oxidized so as to embody or incorporate mobile ions or electrons.

The term "self-doping" means that a material may be rendered conducting or conductive without external introduction of ions by conventional doping techniques. In the self-doping polymers disclosed herein, potential counterions are covalently bound to the polymer backbone.

The term "Bronsted acid" is used to refer to a chemical species which can act as a source of one or more protons, i.e. as a proton-donor. See, e.g., the McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms (3rd Ed. 1984) at page 220. Examples of Bronsted acids thus include carboxylic, sulfonic and phosphoric acids.

The term "Bronsted acid group" as used herein means Bronsted acids as defined above, anions of Bronsted acids (i.e. where the protons have been removed), and salts of Bronsted acids, in which a Bronsted acid anion is associated with a monovalent cationic counterion.

"Monomer units" as used herein refer to the recurring structural units of a polymer. The individual monomer units of a particular polymer may be identical, as in a homopolymer, or different, as in a copolymer.

The polymers of the present invention, which may be copolymers or homopolymers, have a backbone structure that provides a p-electron conjugated system. Examples of such polymer backbones include, but are not limited to, polypyrroles, polythiophenes, polyisothianaphthenes, polyanilines, poly-p-phenylenes and copolymers thereof. The recurring structure described above may constitute anywhere from about 0.01 to about 100 mole % monomers substituted with one or more "-R-X-M" functionalities. In applications requiring high conductivity, usually at least about 10 mole % of the monomer units are substituted, typically about 50 to 100 mole %. In semiconductor applications, it is usually less than about 10 mole % of the monomer units that are substituted, sometimes as little as about 0.1 or about 0.01 mole %.

Polyheterocycle monomer units represented by Formulae I and Ia include monomer units which are either mono-substituted or di-substituted with the -R-X-M functionality. Similarly, the polyaniline monomer units represented by Formulae II and IIa and the poly(p-phenylenevinylene) monomer units represented by Formulae III and IIIa include monomer units which are substituted with 1, 2, 3 or 4 "-R-X-M" substitutents. Copolymers encompassing these different types of substituted monomer units are envisioned by the present invention as well. In both the homopolymers and copolymers of the present invention, between about 0.01% and 100 mole % of the polymer should be provided with Bronsted acid groups.

In a preferred embodiment, the present invention encompasses electrically neutral polymers given by Formulae I, II or III above. In order to render the polymers conductive, they must be oxidized so as to remove the M moiety and yield a polymer containing a recurring zwitterionic structure according to Ia, IIa or IIIa. In the preferred embodiment, for example, Ht may be selected from the group consisting of NH, S, O, Se and Te; M may be H, Na, Li or K; X may be CO₂, SO₃ or HPO₃ ; and R is a straight chain alkyl or ether group (i.e., --(CH₂)_(x) -- or --(CH₂)_(y) O(CH₂)_(z) --, where x and (y+z) are from 1 to about 10). In a particularly preferred embodiment, Ht is NH or S; M is H, Li or Na; X is CO₂ or SO₃ ; R is a linear alkyl having from 2 to about 4 carbon atoms; and the substituted monomers of the polymers are either mono- or disubstituted with -R-X-M groups.

In order to "undope" the zwitterionic form of the polymers, an electric charge may be supplied in the direction contrary to that used in doping (alternatively, a mild reducing agent may be used as discussed below). The M moiety is caused to migrate into the polymer and neutralize the X⁻ counterion. The undoping process is thus as rapid as the doping process.

Schemes I, II and III represent the oxidation and reduction of the above polymers (the mono-substituted embodiment is illustrated), i.e. the transition between the electrically neutral and conductive zwitterionic forms: ##STR4## Where X is CO₂, the above electrochemical conversion is strongly pH-dependent in the pH range of 1-6 (the pK_(a) for X=CO₂ and M=H in Formula I is about 5). Where X is SO₃, on the other hand, the above electrochemical reaction is pH-independent over the much larger pH range of about 1-14 (the pK_(a) for X=SO₃ and M=H in Formulae II and III is about 1). The sulfonic acid derivative is thus charged at virtually any pH, while the carboxylic acid derivative is charged at only lower pH. By varying the pH of the polymer solution, then, it is easier to control the conductivity of the carboxylic acid derivatives than that of the corresponding sulfonic acid derivatives. The particular Bronsted acid moiety selected will thus depend on the particular application.

These self-doped polymers have conductivities of at least about 1 S/cm (see Example 14) and typically have chain lengths of about several hundred monomer units. Typically, chain lengths range from about 100 to about 500 monomer units; higher molecular weights are preferred.

In the practice of the present invention, a Bronsted acid group is introduced into a polymer to make it self-doping. The Bronsted acid may be introduced into a monomer, followed by polymerization or copolymerization. One may also prepare a polymer or copolymer of the unsubstituted monomers of Formulae I or II and then introduce the Bronsted acid into the polymer backbone.

Covalently linking a Bronsted acid to a monomer or polymer is within the skill of the art. See, e.g., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 70:1556 (1948). By way of illustration, an alkyl group on a monomer or polymer backbone can be concatenated to an alkyl halide using N-bromo succinamide (NBS) as shown in Scheme IV: ##STR5## The halide can then be treated with sodium cyanide/sodium hydroxide or sodium sulfite followed by hydrolysis to give a carboxylic or sulfonic Bronsted acid, respectively, as shown in Scheme V: ##STR6## Another example showing the addition of a Bronsted acid with an ether linking group is shown in Scheme VI: ##STR7##

Syntheses of various monomers useful in the practice of the present invention are set forth in Examples 1 through 12, below.

The polymers of the present invention may be synthesized by the electrochemical methods set forth in, e.g., S. Hotta et al., Synth. Metals 9:381 (1984), or by chemical coupling methods such as those described in Wudl et al., J. Org. Chem. 49:3382 (1984), Wudl et al., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 118:199 (1985) and M. Kobayashi et al., Synth. Metals. 9:77 (1984).

When synthesized by electrochemical methods (i.e., anodically), the polymeric zwitterions are produced directly. With the chemical coupling methods, the neutral polymers result. The preferred synthetic method is electrochemical, and is exemplified below by the production of a substituted polyheterocyclic species.

A solution containing the monomer IV ##STR8## with Ht, Y_(i), R, X and M as given above, is provided in a suitable solvent such as acetonitrile (particularly suitable for the sulfonic acid derivative, i.e. where X=SO₃) along with an electrolyte such as tetrabutylammonium perchlorate or tetrabutylammonium fluoroborate. A working electrode of platinum, nickel, indium tin oxide (ITO)-coated glass or other suitable material is provided, as is a counterelectrode (cathode) of platinum or aluminum, preferably platinum. A current of between about 0.5 and 5 mA/cm² is applied across the electrodes, and depending on the extent of polymerization desired (or the thickness of the polymeric film on a substrate), the electropolymerization reaction is carried out for between a few minutes and a few hours. The temperature of the polymerization reaction can range from about -30° C. to about 25° C., but is preferably between about 5° C. and about 25° C.

Reduction of the zwitterionic polymer so produced to the neutral, undoped form may be effected by electrochemical reduction or by treatment with any mild reducing agent, such as methanol or sodium iodide in acetone. This process should be allowed to proceed for at least several hours in order to ensure completion of the reaction.

The sulfonic acid monomer (X=SO₃) is polymerized as the methyl ester (see Examples 14 and 15), while the carboxylic acid derivative (X=CO₂) may be prepared in its acid form. After polymerization of the sulfonic acid derivative, the methyl group is removed in the treatment with sodium iodide or the like.

The polyanilines represented by Formulae II and IIa may be synthesized electrochemically as above or they may be prepared by the reaction of a phenylenediamine with a suitably substituted cyclohexanedione. Scheme VII, below, illustrates this latter synthesis: ##STR9## R X and M are as defined above.

The poly(p-phenylenevinylenes) of Formulae III and IIIa are synthesized somewhat differently: ##STR10##

Copolymerization of different types of monomers represented in Formulae I, II or III may be effected according to the same procedures outlined above. In a preferred embodiment, the majority of monomers are at least mono-substituted with an -R-X-M group as described.

Composites of the polymers of Formulae I, II and III may be prepared in conjunction with water-soluble polymers such as polyvinyl alcohol (see Example 17) and the polysaccharides. Because the polymers of the present invention may be fairly brittle, preparation of composites using additional polymeric materials provides polymers which are more flexible and less brittle. Films may be cast from aqueous solutions of polymers given by Formulae I, II or III also containing a predetermined amount of one or more additional water-soluble polymers. Since the key procedural criterion in this step is dissolving two or more polymers in water, the only practical limitation on the additional polymers is that they be water-soluble.

The polymers of the present invention offer a specific advantage over conventional conducting polymers for use as electrodes in electrochemical cells. Because the counterions are covalently bound to the polymer, the cell capacity is not limited by electrolyte concentration and solubility. This means that in optimized cells, the total amount of electrolyte and solvent can be reduced considerably, thus enhancing the energy density of the resulting battery. The facile kinetics of ion transport provided by the novel self-doping mechanism leads to rapid charge and discharge as well as to faster electrochromic switching. Electrodes fabricated using the polymers of the invention may be fabricated entirely from these polymers or from conventional substrates coated with these polymers. Conventional substrates may include, for example, indium tin oxide coated glass, platinum, nickel, palladium or any other suitable anode materials. When used as an electrode, the internal self-doping of the polymer effects the transition represented by Scheme I.

The self-doped conducting polymers of the invention also offer specific advantages over conventional conducting polymers for use in a variety of device applications where long term performance requires that the dopant ions not be continuously mobile. Examples of such uses include fabrication of Schottky diodes, field effective transistors, etc. Because the dopant ion is covalently bound to the polymer chain in self-doped polymers, the problem of diffusion of the ion (e.g., in the vicinity of a junction or interface) is solved.

EXAMPLES

It is to be understood that while the invention has been described in conjunction with the preferred specific embodiment thereof, that the foregoing description as well as the examples which follow are intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the claimed invention. Other aspects, advantages and modifications within the scope of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains.

EXAMPLE 1 2-(3-Thienyl)-Ethyl Methanesulfonate

To a solution of 5.0 g (7.8×10⁻³ mol) of 2-(3-thienyl)-ethanol (Aldrich Chemical) in 10 ml of dry, freshly distilled pyridine was added 3.62 ml (1.2 equiv.) of methanesulfonyl chloride in 20 ml of pyridine at 5°-10° C. The addition was carried out gradually, over a period of about 15-20 min. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature and was quenched by pouring into a separatory funnel containing water and ether. The layers were separated and the aqueous layer was extracted three times with ether. The combined organic extracts were extracted once with 10% hydrochloric acid, followed by water and drying over Na₂ SO₄. Evaporation of the solvent afforded 5.3 g of a light brown oil (65% yield), and tlc (CHCl₃) showed a single spot. Chromatographic purification on silica gel afforded a light yellow oil. Nmr (CDCl₃, δ rel TMS) 2.9s, 3H; 3.1t, 2H; 4.4t, 2 H; 7.0-7.4m, 3H. Ir (neat, ν, cm⁻¹) 3100w, 2930w, 29202, 1415w, 1355s, 1335s, 1245w, 1173s, 1080w, 1055w, 970s, 955s, 903m, 850m, 825w, 795s, 775s, 740w. MS, 206.0.

EXAMPLE 2 2-(3-Thienyl)-Ethyl Iodide

The above methanesulfonate (5.36, 2.6×10⁻² mol) was added to a solution of 7.7 g (2 equiv) of NaI in 30 ml of acetone and allowed to react at room temperature for 24 hr. The CH₃ SO₃ Na which had precipitated was separated by filtration. The filtrate was poured into water, extracted with chloroform, and the organic layer was dried over MgSO₄. Evaporation of the solvent afforded a light brown oil which upon chromatographic purification gave 5.05 g of a light yellow oil (82.5%). Nmr (CDCl₃, δ rel to TMS): 3.2m, 4H; 7.0-7.4m, 3H. Ir (KBr, ν, cm⁻¹): 3100m, 2960s, 2920s, 2850w, 1760w, 1565w, 1535w, 1450m, 1428s, 1415s, 1390w, 1328w, 1305w, 1255s, 1222m, 1170s, 1152m, 1100w, 1080m, 1020w, 940m, 900w, 857s, 840s, 810w, 770s, 695s, 633m. MS 238.

EXAMPLE 3 Sodium-2-(3-Thienyl)-Ethanesulfonate

To a 10 ml aqueous solution of 5.347 g (4.2×10⁻² mol) of Na₂ SO₃ was added 5.05 g (0.5 equiv) of the above iodide and the reaction mixture was heated to 70° C. for 45 hr. The resulting mixture was evaporated to dryness followed by washing with chloroform to remove the unreacted iodide (0.45 g) and acetone to remove the sodium iodide. The remaining solid was a mixture of the desired sodium salt contaminated with excess sodium sulfite and was used in subsequent steps without further purification. Nmr (D₂ O, δ rel TMS propanesulfonate): 3.1s, 4H; 7.0-7.4m, 3H. Ir (KBr, ν, cm⁻¹, Na₂ SO₃ peaks subtracted) 1272m, 1242s, 1210s, 1177s, 1120m, 1056s, 760m, 678w.

EXAMPLE 4 2-(3-Thienyl)-Ethanesulfonyl Chloride

To a stirred suspension of 2 g of the above mixture of salts prepared in Example 3 was added dropwise 2 ml of distilled thionyl chloride. The mixture was allowed to stir for 30 min. The white solid resulting from ice-water quench was separated by filtration and recrystallized from chloroform-hexane to afford 800 mg of white crystals, mp 57°-58° C. Nmr (CDCl₃, δ rel TMS) 3.4m, 2H; 3.9m, 2H; 7.0-7.4m, 3H. Ir (KBr, ν, cm⁻¹) 3100w, 2980w, 2960w, 2930w, 1455w, 1412w, 1358s, 1278w, 1260w, 1225w, 1165s, 1075w, 935w, 865m, 830m, 790s, 770w, 750m, 678s, 625m. El. Anal. Calcd. for C₆ H₇ ClO₂ S₂ : C, 34.20; H, 3.35; Cl, 16.83; S, 30.43. Found: C, 34.38; H, 3.32; Cl, 16.69; S, 30.24.

EXAMPLE 5 Methyl 2-(3-Thienyl)-Ethanesulfonate

To a stirred solution of 105 mg (5×10⁻⁴ mol) of the above acid chloride (prepared in Example 4) in 1.5 ml of freshly distilled (from molecular sieves) methanol was added, at room temperature, 1.74 ml (2 equiv) of N,N-diisopropylethylamine. The reaction mixture was stirred for 12 hr and then transferred to a separatory funnel containing dilute, aqueous HCl and was extracted with chloroform thrice. After the combined organic layers were dried with Na₂ SO₄, the solvent was evaporated to afford a light brown oil which was purified by chromatography on silica gel with chloroform as eluent. The resulting colorless solid, obtained in 90% yield had an mp of 27°-28.5° C. Ir (neat film, v, cm⁻¹) 3100w, 2960w, 2930w, 1450m, 1415w, 1355s, 1250w, 1165s, 985s, 840w, 820w, 780m, 630w, 615w. Uv-vis [λmax, MeOH, nm(ε)] 234 (6×10³). Nmr (CDCl₃, δ rel TMS) 7.42-7.22q, 1H; 7.18-6.80m, 2H; 3.85s, 3H; 3.6-2.9m, 4H. El. Anal. Calcd. for C₇ H₁₀ O₃ S₂ : C, 40.76; H, 4.89; S, 31.08. Found: C, 40.90; H, 4.84; S, 30.92.

EXAMPLE 6 Ethyl-2-Carboxyethyl-4-(3-Thienyl)-Butanoate

To a stirred solution of 11.2 g (69.94 mmol) of diethyl malonate in 60 ml of freshly distilled DMF, was added 2.85 g (69.94 mmol) of a 60% oil dispersion of NaH. After 30 min stirring, 15.86 g (66.61 mmol) of 2-(3 -thienyl)-ethyl iodide (prepared as described above) in 20 ml of DMF was added dropwise over 10 min. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for one hr and then heated to 140° for four hr. Upon cooling, the reaction was poured into ice-dil. HCl and extracted six times with ether. The combined organic layers were washed with water, dried with Na₂ SO₄ and evaporated to afford a brown oil. After chromatography on silica gel (50% hexane in chloroform), a colorless oil was obtained in 98% yield. El. Anal. Calcd. for C₁₃ H₁₈ O₄ S: C, 57.76; H, 6.71; S, 11.86. Found: C, 57.65; H, 6.76; S, 11.77. Nmr (CDCl₃, δ rel TMS) 7.40-7.20t, 1H; 7.10-6.86d, 2H; 4.18q, 4H; 3.33t, 1H; 2.97-1.97m, 4H; 1.23t, 6H. Ir (neat film, v, cm⁻¹) 2980w, 1730s, 1450w, 1370w, 775w.

EXAMPLE 7 2-Carboxy-4-(3-Thienyl)-Butanoic Acid

To a stirred solution of 1.4 g (24.96 mmol) of potassium hydroxide in 7.0 ml of 50% ethanol in water, was added the above diester (765 mg, 2.83 mmol) prepared in Example 6. The resulting reaction was allowed to stir at room temperature for two hr, followed by overnight reflux. The resulting mixture was poured into ice-10% HCl, followed by three ether extractions. The combined organic layer was dried with Na₂ SO₄ and evaporated to afford a white solid in 90% which was recrystallized from chloroform-hexane to produce colorless needles. Mp, 118°-119° C.; nmr (DMSO/d6, δ rel TMS) 12.60br s, 2H; 7.53-6.80m, 3H; 3.20t, 1H; 2.60t, 2H; 1.99q, 2H. Ir (KBr, v, cm⁻¹) 2900w, 1710s, 1410w, 1260w, 925w, 780s. El. Anal. Calcd. for C₉ H₁₀ O₄ S: C, 56.45; H, 5.92; S, 18.83. Found: C, 56.39; H, 5.92; S, 18.67.

EXAMPLE 8 4-(3-Thienyl)-Butyl Methanesulfonate

4-(3-thienyl)-butanoic acid (CA 69:18565x, 72:121265k) was prepared by standard thermal decarboxylation of the carboxy acid prepared in Example 7. This compound was then reduced to give 4-(3-thienyl)-butanol (CA 70:68035r, 72: 121265k) also using standard methods.

To a solution of 1.05 g (6.7×10⁻³ mol) of 4-(3-thienyl)-butanol in 25 ml of dry, freshly distilled pyridine was added 0.85 g (1.1 equiv.) of methane-sulfonyl chloride at 25° C. The addition was gradual and carried out over a several minute period. The reaction mixture was stirred for 6 hr at room temperature and quenched by pouring into a separatory funnel containing water-HCl and ether. The layers were separated and the aqueous layer was extracted once with 10% hydrochloric acid, followed by extraction with water and drying with Na₂ SO₄. Evaporation of the solvent afforded 1.51 g of a light brown oil (95% yield), tlc (CHCl₃) showed a single spot. El. Anal. Calcd. for C₉ H₁₄ O₃ S₂ : C, 46.13; H, 6.02; S, 27.36. Found: C, 45.92; H, 5.94; S, 27.15. Nmr (CDCl₃, δ rel TMS) 2.0-1.5 brs, 4H; 2.67 brt, 2H; 2.97s, 3H; 4.22t, 2H; 7.07-6.80d, 2H; 7.37-7.13, 1H.

EXAMPLE 9 4-(3-Thienyl Butyl Iodide)

The above methanesulfonate (1.51 g, 6.4×10⁻³ mol) prepared in Example 8 was added to a solution of 1.93 g (2 equiv.) of NaI in 14 ml of acetone and allowed to react at room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was then heated to reflux for 5 hr. The CH₃ SO₃ Na which had precipitated was separated by filtration. The filtrate was poured into water, extracted with chloroform and the organic layer was dried with MgSO₄. Evaporation of the solvent afforded a light brown oil which upon chromatographic purification (silica gel, 60% hexane in chloroform) gave 1.34 g of a colorless oil (78%). Nmr (CDCl₃, δ rel to TMS) 1.53-2.20m, 4H; 2.64t, 2H; 3.17t, 2H; 6.83-7.10d, 2H; 7.13-7.37t, 1H. Ir (KBr, v, cm⁻¹) 2960s, 2905s, 2840s, 1760w, 1565w, 1535w, 1450s, 1428s, 1415s, 1190s, 750s, 695m, 633m. MS 266.0. El. Anal. Calcd. for C₈ H₁₁ IS: C, 36.10; H, 4.17; I, 47.68; S, 12.05. Found: C, 37.68; H, 4.35; I, 45.24; S. 12.00

EXAMPLE 10 Sodium-4-(3-Thienyl)-Butanesulfonate

To a 2 ml aqueous solution of 1.271 g (1×10⁻² mol) of Na₂ SO₃ was added 1.34 g (0.5 equiv) of the above iodide prepared in Example 9. The reaction mixture was heated to reflux for 18 hr. The resulting mixture was evaporated to dryness, followed by washing with chloroform to remove the unreacted iodide and with acetone to remove the sodium iodide. The remaining solid was a mixture of the desired sodium salt contaminated with excess sodium sulfite and was used in subsequent steps without further purification. Nmr (D₂ O, δ rel TMS propane-sufonate) 1.53-1.97m, 4H; 2.47-3.13m, 4H; 6.97-7.20d, 2H; 7.30-7.50q, 1H. Ir (KBr, v, cm⁻¹, Na₂ SO₃ peaks subtracted) 2905w, 1280m, 1210s, 1180s, 1242m, 1210s, 1180s, 1130s, 1060s, 970s, 7700s, 690w, 630s, 605s.

EXAMPLE 11 4-(3-Thienyl)-Butanesulfonyl Chloride

To a stirred suspension of 1.00 g of the above mixture of salts (from Example 10) in 10 ml of freshly distilled DMF was added dropwise 1.43 g of distilled thionyl chloride. The mixture was allowed to stir for 3 hr. The slightly yellow oil resulting from ice-water quench was isolated by twice extracting with ether, followed by drying of the organic layer with Na₂ SO₄ to yield 566 mg of a slightly yellow oil which crystallized slowly (mp 26°-27°) after chromatography (silica gel, chloroform). Nmr (CDCl₃, δ rel TMS) 1.45-2.38m, 4H; 2.72t, 2H; 3.65t, 2H; 6.78-7.12d, 2H; 7.18-7.42, 1H. Ir (neat film, v, cm⁻¹) 3120w, 2920s, 2870m, 1465m, 1370s, 1278w, 1260w, 1160s, 1075w, 935w, 850w, 830m, 7765s, 680m, 625w, 585s, 535s, 510s. El. Anal. Calcd. for C₈ H₁₁ ClO₂ S₂ : C, 40.25; H, 4.64; Cl, 14.85; S, 26.86. Found: C, 40.23; H, 4.69; Cl, 14.94; S, 26.68.

EXAMPLE 12 Methyl 4-(3-Thienyl)-Butanesulfonate

To a stirred solution of 362 mg (1.5×10⁻³ mol) of the above acid chloride prepared in Example 11 in 6 ml of freshly distilled (from molecular sieves) methanol was added, at room temperature, 392 mg (2 equiv) of N,N-diisopropylethylamine. The reaction mixture was stirred for 2 hr and then transferred to a separatory funnel containing dilute, aqueous HCl and was extracted with chloroform thrice. After the combined organic layers were dried with Na₂ SO₄, the solvent was evaporated to afford a light brown oil which was purified by chromatography on silica gel with 40% hexane in chloroform as eluent. The resulting colorless oil, obtained in 84% yield had the following properties: El. Anal. Calcd. for C₉ H₁₄ S₂ O₃ : C, 46.13; H, 6.02; S, 27.36. Found: C, 45.97; H, 5.98; S, 27.28. Ir (neat film, v, cm⁻¹) 3100w, 2970m, 2860w, 1460m, 1410w, 1350s, 1250w, 1160s, 982s, 830m, 800m, 770s, 710w, 690w, 630w, 613w, 570m. Uv-vis [λmax, MeOH, nm (e)] 220 (6.6×10³). Nmr (CDCl₃, δ rel to TMS) 7.33-7.13 (t, 1H), 7.03-6.77 (d, 2H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.09 (t, 2H), 2.67 (t,2H), 2.2-1.5 (m, 4H).

EXAMPLE 13 Polymerization of Thiophene-3-Acetic Acid ##STR11##

Thiophene-3-acetic acid (Formula V) was polymerized at room temperature by the electrochemical polymerization method of S. Hotta et al., Synth. Metals, supra, using acetonitrile as the solvent and LiClO₄ as the electrolyte. Blue-black films were produced, indicating formation of the zwitterionic polymer of Formula II (Y₁ =H, Y₂ =-R-X-M, Ht=S, X=CO₂, M=H). The polymer films were electrochemically cycled and observed to undergo a color change from blue-black to yellowish brown, indicating reduction of the zwitterionic form of the polymer to the neutral form represented by Formula I. The infrared spectrum was in agreement with the proposed structure (see FIGS. 1 and 2).

EXAMPLE 14 Poly(Thiophene-3-(2-Ethanesulfonic Acid Sodium Salt) ##STR12##

Methyl thiophene-3-(2-ethanesulfonate) (Formula VI) was prepared as above. Polymerization of the above monomer was carried out as in Example 13, except that the polymerization temperature was maintained at -27° C. The resultant polymer ("methyl P3-ETS", Formula VII) was then treated with sodium iodide in acetone to remove the methyl group from the sulfonic acid functionality and produce, in quantitative yield (˜98%), the corresponding sodium salt of the polymer, i.e. of poly(thiophene-3-(2-ethanesulfonic acid)) ("P3-ETSNa") as shown in Formula VIII. The polymeric methyl ester and the polymeric sodium salt were characterized by infrared and ultraviolet spectroscopy as well as by elemental analysis (see FIGS. 3 and 4). The sodium salt was found to be soluble in all proportions in water, enabling the casting of films from aqueous solution.

Electrochemical cells were constructed in glass to demonstrate electrochemical doping and charge storage via in situ optoelectrochemical spectroscopy. The cells included a film of the above polymer on ITO-coated glass (which served as the anode), a platinum counterelectrode (cathode) and a silver/silver chloride reference electrode with tetrabutylammonium perchlorate as electrolyte. FIG. 5 depicts a series of vis-near ir spectra of the P3-ETSNa taken with the cell charged to a series of successively higher open circuit voltages. The results were typical of conducting polymers in that the π--π^(*) transition was depleted with a concomitant shift of oscillator strength into two characteristic infrared bands. The results of FIG. 5 demonstrate both reversible charge storage and electrochromism.

The electrical conductivity was measured with the standard 4-probe techniques using a film of the polymer cast from water onto a glass substrate onto which gold contacts had been previously deposited. Upon exposure to bromine vapor, the electrical conductivity of P3-ETSNa rose to ˜1 S/cm.

EXAMPLE 15 Poly(Thiophene-3-(4-Butanesulfonic Acid Sodium Salt) ##STR13##

Methyl thiophene-3-(4-butanesulfonate) (Formula IX) was prepared as above. Polymerization was carried out under conditions identical to those set forth in Examples 13 and 14 above. The resultant polymer (designated "methyl P3-BTS", Formula X) was treated with sodium iodide in acetone to produce, in quantitative yield, the polymeric sodium salt of thiophene-3-(4-butanesulfonic acid) ("P3-BTSNa", Formula XI). The polymeric methyl ester (Formula X) and the corresponding sodium salt (Formula XI) were characterized spectroscopically (ir, uv-vis) and by elemental analysis. The sodium salt was The sodium salt was discovered to be soluble in all proportions in water, enabling the casting of films from aqueous solution.

Electrochemical cells were constructed as in Example 14 in order to demonstrate electrochemical doping and charge storage via in situ optoelectrochemical spectroscopy. FIGS. 6 and 7 depict a series of vis-near ir spectra of the P3-BTSNa and methyl P3-BTS respectively, taken with the cells charged to successively higher open circuit voltages. As in Example 14, the results were found to be typical of conducting polymers in that the π--π^(*) transition was depleted with a concomitant shift of oscillator strength into two characteristic infrared bands. As in Example 14, the results of FIGS. 6 and 7 demonstrate both reversible charge storage and electrochromism.

EXAMPLE 16 Polymerization and Analysis of Poly(Thiophene-3-Sulfonic Acid)(n=2)

The polymeric sodium salt of thiophene-3-sulfonic acid (Ht=S, Y₁ =H, Y₂ =-R-X-M, X=-CH₂ CH₂ -, X=SO₃, M=H) was prepared as outlined above, dissolved in water and subjected to ion exchange chromatography on the acid form of a cation exchange resin. The results of atomic absorption analysis of the dark red-brown effluent indicated complete replacement of sodium by hydrogen. FIG. 8 shows the results of cyclic voltammetry carried out on films of the polymer ("P3-ETSH"/ITO glass working electrode, platinum counterelectrode, and a silver/silver chloride reference electrode in acetonitrile with fluoroboric acid-trifluoroacetic acid as electrolyte). The figure indicates that P3-ETSH is an electrochemically robust polymer when cycled between +0.1 and +1.2 V versus silver/silver chloride in a strongly acidic medium. There are two closely spaced oxidation waves, the first of which corresponds to a change in color from orange to green. The polymer could be cycled and corresponding color changes observed without noticeable change in stability at 100 mV/sec.

Electrochemical cells were constructed in glass to demonstrate electrochemical doping and charge storage via in situ optoelectrochemical spectroscopy, substantially as in the previous two Examples. The cells consisted of a film of the polymer on ITO glass (anode), platinum counterelectrode (cathode) and a silver/silver chloride reference electrode in acetonitrile with fluoroboric acid-trifluoroacetic acid as electrolyte.

FIG. 9 depicts a series of vis-near ir spectra of the P3-ETSH taken with the cell charged to a series of successively higher open circuit voltages. In this case, the polymer was observed to spontaneously dope in the strongly acidic electrolyte solution. The results of FIG. 9 demonstrate both reversible charge storage and electrochromism. Control of the self-doping level for brief periods of time was achieved by imposing a voltage lower than the equilibrium circuit voltage.

EXAMPLE 17 Preparation of Polymer Composite

Poly(thiophene-3-sulfonic acid) (Formula I, Ht=S, Y₁ =H, Y₂ =-R-X-M, R=-CH₂ CH₂, X=SO₃, M=H, "P3-ETSH") as prepared in Example 4 was used to prepare a composite as follows. The compound was admixed with a solution of polyvinyl alcohol in water, and films of the neutral polymer were cast. Free standing deep orange films (indicating charge neutrality, as opposed to the blue-black zwitterionic polymers) cast from the prepared solution had excellent mechanical properties (soft, smooth and flexible) and could be chemically doped and undoped by compensation. This method of making conducting polymer composites is broadly applicable to the use of any water-soluble polymer in conjunction with P3-ETSH or P3-BTSH.

EXAMPLE 18 Preparation of Polymer of 2,5-Dicarboxyethyl-1,4-Cyclohexanedione and p-Phenylenediamine

To a suspension of 8.51 g (33.21 mmole) of 2,5-dicarboxyethyl-1,4-cyclohexanedione in 380 ml of freshly distilled butanol was added 3.59 g of p-phenylenediamine in 20 ml of butanol, followed by 40 ml of glacial acetic acid. The resulting mixture was heated to reflux for a period of 36 hrs, then it was exposed to oxygen by refluxing over a period of twelve hours, was hot filtered, the solid was washed with ether and extracted in a Soxhlet extractor with the following solvents: chloroform (6 days), chlorobenzene (5 days), and ether (4 days). This treatment afforded a dark solid (8.42 g). Elemental analysis calcd. for C₁₈ H₁₈ N₂ O₄ : C, 65.84; H, 6.14; N, 8.53. Found: C, 65.55; H, 6.21; N, 8.70. Ir (KBr, ν cm-¹): 3350w, 3240w, 2980m, 2900w, 1650s, 1600s, 1510s, 1440m, 1400w, 1220s, 1090w, 1065s, 820w, 770m, 600w, 495w.

EXAMPLE 19 Polyaniline Dicarboxylic Acid

The above polymer diester is suspended in DMF and treated with a solution of 50% (w/w) sodium hydroxide. The reaction mixture is then heated to 100° C. for 48 hr under strictly anaerobic conditions to exclude oxygen. Upon cooling the mixture, it is poured into ice/HCl and filtered. The infrared spectrum of the product should show the following characteristic absorption peaks: 3100-2900br, 1600s, 1500s, 1210s.

The following examples are directed to the synthesis of a poly(p-phenylenevinylene) (PPV) according to Scheme IX: ##STR14##

EXAMPLE 20 Synthesis of a Poly(p-Phenylenevinylene) Synthesis of (A)

To 200 ml of absolute ethanol was added 10.5 g sodium pellets at room temperature (RT). After the sodium was completely consumed, a solution of 22.32 g 4-methoxyphenol in 80 ml of absolute ethanol was added. The resulting solution was stirred for 10 min, then treated with 25.2 ml of 3-chloropropanol. The mixture was refluxed for 16 hr, the solvent was removed in vacuum, and the residue was taken up in 200 ml of ether. After titration over charcoal, the titrate was concentrated to about 25 ml. A large amount of white solid crystallized out to give 21.5 g IR (KBr, cm⁻¹) 3300, 3050, 2960, 2940, 2880, 2840, 1520, 1480, 1450, 1400, 1300, 1245, 1185, 1065, 1040, 950, 830, 730. ¹ H NMR (CD₃ OD, δ rel to TMS): 1.6-2.0 (Q,2H), 3.5-4.0 (M,7H), 6.7 (S,4H). MS(EI,%): 182(M,41), 124(100), 109(61).

Synthesis of (B)

To a solution of 5.10 g 3-(methoxyphenoxyl)propanol(A) in 20 ml of freshly distilled pyridine was added 3.26 ml of methanesulfonyl chloride in 5 ml pyridine. The reaction mixture was stirred at RT overnight and then poured into a separatory funnel containing 80 ml of water and 80 ml of ether. The layers were separated and the aqueous layer was extracted twice with 40 ml ether each time. The combined organic layers were extracted twice with 40 ml of 10% hydrochloric acid followed by rinsing twice with 40 ml H₂ O and drying with sodium sulfate for two hr. After evaporation of the solvent, a light brown oil was obtained which upon passing through a 16×2.5 cm silica gel column using CHCl₃ as eluent gave 6.04 g light yellow oil (65%). IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3020, 2960, 2940, 2880, 2840, 1600, 1510, 1470, 1450, 1360, 1300, 1240, 1180, 1110, 1060, 980, 950, 830. ¹ H NMR (CDCl₃, δ rel to TMS) 2.0-2.4 (Q,2H), 3.1 (S,3H), 3.8 (S,3H), 3.9-4.2 (T,2H), 4.3-4.6 (T,2H), 6.8 (S,4H).

Synthesis of (C)

To a solution of 6.75 g of NaI in 100 ml of acetone was added 3.9 g (B). The mixture was allowed to react at RT for 24 hr. The CH₃ SO₃ Na, which had precipitated, was separated by filtration. The filtrate was poured into water extracted with chloroform and the organic layer was dried with MgSO₄. Evaporation of the solvent afforded 4.073 g of product (93%) which upon passing through an 18×2.5 cm silica gel column using hexane as eluent gave 3.20 g of dark-red liquid (73%). IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3020, 3000, 2950, 2870, 2820, 1600, 1510, 1470, 1450, 1390, 1300, 1230, 1180, 1110, 1040, 830, 740. ¹ H NMR (CDCl₃, δ rel to TMS): 2.1-2.4 (M,2H), 3.2-3.5 (T,2H), 3.7-4.1 (M,5H), 6.8 (S,4H). MS(EI,%), 292 (M,25), 202(15), 200(39), 124(100), 123(71), 109(61), 95(25), 81(11), 77(11), 64(11), 63(13), 52(12).

SYNTHESIS OF (D)

To 80 ml of an aqueous solution of 15.36 g of Na₂ SO₃ was added 17.8 g of (C) and the reaction mixture was heated to 70° C. for 85 hr. The resulting solution was extracted with CHCl₃ to remove unreacted iodide (1.98 g). The aqueous layer was distilled in a rotary evaporator to remove water. The residue was washed with anhydrous acetone to remove sodium iodide. The remaining solid was then dissolved in 600 ml of water and passed through Amberlite IR-120 (plus) ion-exchange resin. The solution was concentrated to 200 ml in vacuum at 80° C. and was neutralized by 0.5N NaOH solution. After evaporation of the solvent, 12.8 g of grey-white solid was obtained (88%). IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3020, 2960, 2920, 2880, 2840, 1520, 1480, 1450, 1300, 1250, 1230, 1200, 1120, 1070, 1040, 830, 740, 640. ¹ H NMR (D₂ O, d rel to DSS): 2.1-2.4 (Q,2H), 2.9-3.3 (T,2H), 3.8 (S,3H), 4.0-4.2 (T,2H), 7.0 (S,4H).

Synthesis of (E)

To a stirred suspension of 20.5 g of (D) in 80 ml of DMF was added dropwise 20 ml of thionyl chloride, and the mixture was allowed to stir for 45 min. The mixture was then quenched with 400 ml of ice water and extracted with 300 ml of ether. The ether layer was washed twice with 200 ml of cold water, then the ether layer was dried with MgSO₄. Evaporation of solvent afforded 13.3 g of yellow solid product. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3050, 2950, 2880, 2840, 1600, 1510, 1480, 1450, 1380, 1300, 1240, 1170, 1110, 1050, 930, 830, 750, 730, 700. ¹ H NMR (CDCl₃, δ rel to TMS): 2.2-2.6 (M, b 2H), 3.8-4.3 (M,7H), 6.9 (S,4H). MS(EI, %), 266 (M⁺ +2,16), 265 (M⁺ +1,5), 264 (M⁺, 40), 143(20), 141(54), 137(20), 124(59), 123(100, 109(44), 95(23).

Synthesis of (F)

To 150 ml of 37% formaldehyde aqueous solution was added 100 ml of concentrated hydrochloric acid at 0° C. The mixture was saturated with hydrogen chloride gas for 15 min before addition of 15 g of the above sulfonyl chloride (E) in 80 ml of dioxane. The resulting mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature for 3 hr. The white solid which formed was collected by filtration and was recrystallized from benzene to give 17.4 g white product (92%). Anal. calc'd for (C₁₂ H₁₅ Cl₃ O₄ S): C 39.83; H 4.15. Found: C 40.01; H 4.15. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3060, 3000, 2980, 2940, 2880, 2840, 1520, 1470, 1420, 1400, 1360, 1320, 1270, 1240, 1160, 1070, 1050, 1030, 940, 920, 870, 800, 730, 690, 600. ¹ H NMR (CDCl₃, d rel to TMS): 2.4-2.8 (Q,2H), 3.8-4.3 (M,7H), 4.6 (S,4H), 7.3 (S,2H).

Synthesis of (G)

To 922 mg (F) in 10 ml of acetone and 10 ml of methanol was added 2 ml of dimethylsulfide. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for two days under nitrogen. After the solvent was removed, the residue was precipitated with acetone and dried in vacuum to afford (G) in quantitative yield. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3000, 2910, 2840, 1510, 1470, 1425, 1400, 1320, 1230, 1190, 1150, 1040, 940, 900, 870, 730, 700, 600. ¹ H NMR (CD₃ OD, rel to TMS): 2.3-2.6 (M,2H), 3.0 (S,12H), 3.9-4.4 (M,7H), 4.8 (S,4H, 7.3 (S,2H).

Polymerization of (G)

Method 1.

To a solution of monomer (G) (1.075, 2 mmol) in 5 ml of MeOH was added 0.48 ml of 25% NaOMe in MeOH at 0° C. under nitrogen. A viscous gum was formed immediately. After a reaction time of 0.5 hr, the solvent was decanted and 8 ml of water and 2 ml of DMF were added. The resulting mixture was heated to reflux for half an hour to give a clear yellow-greenish solution. The solution was dialyzed against deionized water with Spectropore membrane tubing for 24 hr to give the desired aqueous solution of precursor polymer (L) with pH value around 4.5. The precursor polymer (L) can be cast into films from aqueous solution. UV (film, λmax): 370. IR (film, ν cm⁻¹) 3450 (H₂ O), 3080, 3010, 2950, 2880, 1650, 1510, 1470, 1330, 1210(broad), 1045, 940, 880, 800, 730, 690, 610, 530.

Method 2.

Monomer (G) can also be polymerized by sodium hydroxide in water under similar conditions. But in the case of sodium hydroxide, one obtains a slightly viscous, milky solution instead of gum. This milky solution became clear after refluxing with a small amount of DMF. Upon water dialysis, the aqueous solution of the precursor polymer was obtained with the same UV and IR spectra as the above.

Conversion of (L) into PPV

There are three ways to convert the precursor polymer (L) into fully conjugated PPV:

Method 1.

The precursor polymer (L) was cast into films from aqueous solution. The films then were heated to 200° C. and maintained at this temperature for 4 hr in vacuo to yield an insoluble and infusible black film with brilliant appearance. UV (λmax, nm): 490. IR (ν cm⁻¹): 4000-2000 (broad dispersion), 1610, 1520s, 1410, 1350, 1210 (broad), 1040s, 960, 850, 800, 750, 600. Conductivity: σ(300K, air)=2×10⁻⁶ S cm⁻¹.

Method 2.

The aqueous solution of the precursor polymer (L) (10 ml) was mixed with 10 ml of ethylene glycol. The mixture was heated to the boiling point. After all the water was removed, the temperature of the solution was increased to 190° C. and the solution turned red. The solution was maintained at reflux for 6 hr under nitrogen, then cooled and dialyzed against deionized water for 24 hr to afford a red aqueous solution of substituted PPV from which a hygroscopic black film can be cast on a plastic weighing bowl at 45° C. in vacuo.

Method 3.

The aqueous solution of the precursor polymer (L) was mixed with the same volume of DMF and excess of sodium methoxide. The mixture was heated to reflux for 4 hr to yield a red solution. After water dialysis, a red aqueous solution of substituted PPV was obtained.

The polymers obtained from methods 2 and 3 have the same UV and IR spectra as that from Method 3, but have higher conductivity ranging from 10⁻⁴ -10² S cm⁻¹ which is humidity dependent. 

We claim:
 1. A conducting water-soluble, self-doped polymer having along its backbone a π-electron conjugated system which comprises approximately 100 to 500 monomer units, wherein between about 0.01 and 100 mole % of the units have the following chemical formula ##STR15## wherein Y₂ and Y₃ are H;Y₄ is -R_(n) -X-M; n is 0; X is CO₂ ; and M is H.
 2. An aqueous solution useful for casting conducting polymeric films, comprising(a) a self-doped polymer comprising about 100 to 500 monomer units, wherein 0.01 to 100 mole % of the monomer units have the chemical formula ##STR16## wherein Y₂ and Y₃ are H, Y₄ is -Rn-X-M, n is 0, x is CO₂, and M is H; and (b) an amount of water at least sufficient to dissolve the polymer. 